Command A vs Llama 4 Scout

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Command A

Cohere · Mar 2025

Cohere's enterprise RAG specialist — 111B dense, two-GPU deployable, with downloadable weights for private deployments.

Llama 4 Scout

Meta · Apr 2025

A 10M-token context window — still the largest ever shipped — in a 109B MoE that fits on a single H100.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Llama 4 Scout works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens. Llama 4 Scout also takes 10M of context versus 262K for Command A.

Specs & pricing

Command ALlama 4 Scout
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$2.5$0.18
Output price / 1M$10$0.59
Context window262K10M
Max output8K
Open weightsyes (CC-BY-NC 4.0)yes (Llama 4 Community License)
Reasoning modelnono
Multimodal inputtexttext, image
Knowledge cutoffJun 2024Aug 2024
ReleasedMar 2025Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$40.00$2.68

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Llama 4 Scout works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens. Llama 4 Scout also takes 10M of context versus 262K for Command A.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
Command A costs $2.5/$10 per million input/output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/$0.59. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $40.00 versus $2.68.
Which model is better for coding, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons