Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GLM-5.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025

65.5

The model that made 30-hour autonomous coding sessions real — 77.2% SWE-bench Verified and a 1M-token context beta at $3/$15.

GLM-5.1

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Apr 2026

The April 2026 GLM refresh — the first open-weights model to take #1 on SWE-bench Pro, edging out Claude Opus 4.6.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. GLM-5.1 is about 2.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). And GLM-5.1 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.5GLM-5.1
modhub Index65.5
Input price / 1M$3$1.4
Output price / 1M$15$4.4
Context window200K200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Feb 2026
ReleasedSep 2025Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$52.50$20.60

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. GLM-5.1 is about 2.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). And GLM-5.1 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-5.1 costs $1.4/$4.4. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $20.60.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons