Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025

65.5

The model that made 30-hour autonomous coding sessions real — 77.2% SWE-bench Verified and a 1M-token context beta at $3/$15.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

The verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 3.1 Pro is about 1.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
77.2%~78%
Claude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3.1 Pro

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
modhub Index65.5
Input price / 1M$3$2
Output price / 1M$15$12
Context window200K2M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$52.50$38.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 3.1 Pro is about 1.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $38.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores ~78% versus 77.2% for Claude Sonnet 4.5, making Gemini 3.1 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons