Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

Grok Code Fast 1

xAI · Aug 2025

A speed-first coding model built for agentic IDE loops, popular as a cheap fast tier in Cursor and similar tools.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 19x cheaper per blended million tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 also takes 256K of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
80.9%70.8%
Claude Opus 4.5Grok Code Fast 1

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5Grok Code Fast 1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$0.2
Output price / 1M$25$1.5
Context window200K256K
Max output64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Aug 2025
ReleasedNov 2025Aug 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$4.25

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 19x cheaper per blended million tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 also takes 256K of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/$1.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $4.25.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok Code Fast 1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% versus 70.8% for Grok Code Fast 1, making Claude Opus 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons