Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

GLM-5.1

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Apr 2026

The April 2026 GLM refresh — the first open-weights model to take #1 on SWE-bench Pro, edging out Claude Opus 4.6.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-5.1 works out roughly 4.7x cheaper per blended million tokens. And GLM-5.1 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$1.4
Output price / 1M$25$4.4
Context window200K200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Feb 2026
ReleasedNov 2025Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$20.60

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-5.1 works out roughly 4.7x cheaper per blended million tokens. And GLM-5.1 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-5.1 costs $1.4/$4.4. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $20.60.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-5.1?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons