Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 10x cheaper per blended million tokens. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 30

SWE-bench Verified
80.9%68%
Claude Opus 4.5GLM-4.6
GPQA Diamond
~87%~81%
Claude Opus 4.5GLM-4.6
Terminal-Bench
59.3%40.5%
Claude Opus 4.5GLM-4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5GLM-4.6
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$5$0.6
Output price / 1M$25$2.2
Context window200K200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jul 2025
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$9.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Opus 4.5 wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 10x cheaper per blended million tokens. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $9.30.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Claude Opus 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons