Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google · Mar 2026

The cheapest Gemini 3 model: multimodal input and a 1M context for $0.25/$1.50 — built for massive-scale pipelines.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite works out roughly 18x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$0.25
Output price / 1M$25$1.5
Context window200K1M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedNov 2025Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$4.75

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite works out roughly 18x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25/$1.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $4.75.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons