Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025

65.5

The model that made 30-hour autonomous coding sessions real — 77.2% SWE-bench Verified and a 1M-token context beta at $3/$15.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 30

SWE-bench Verified
80.9%77.2%
Claude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPQA Diamond
~87%83.4%
Claude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Terminal-Bench
59.3%50%
Claude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
modhub Index65.5
Input price / 1M$5$3
Output price / 1M$25$15
Context window200K200K
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Claude Opus 4.5 wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% versus 77.2% for Claude Sonnet 4.5, making Claude Opus 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons