Claude Haiku 4.5 vs OpenAI o4-mini

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic · Oct 2025

Anthropic's fast tier: Sonnet-4-class coding performance at $1/$5 and more than twice the speed.

OpenAI o4-mini

OpenAI · Apr 2025

80.9

A compact reasoning model that punched far above its price on math — 92.7% on AIME 2025 at $1.10 per million input tokens.

The verdict

Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI o4-mini split the 2 benchmarks they share evenly (1–1), so capability alone won't settle this one. OpenAI o4-mini is about 1.0x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 11

SWE-bench Verified
73.3%68.1%
Claude Haiku 4.5OpenAI o4-mini
GPQA Diamond
~73%81.4%
Claude Haiku 4.5OpenAI o4-mini

Specs & pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5OpenAI o4-mini
modhub Index80.9
Input price / 1M$1$1.1
Output price / 1M$5$4.4
Context window200K200K
Max output64K100K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2025May 2024
ReleasedOct 2025Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$17.50$17.60

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or OpenAI o4-mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and OpenAI o4-mini split the 2 benchmarks they share evenly (1–1), so capability alone won't settle this one. OpenAI o4-mini is about 1.0x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or OpenAI o4-mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/$5 per million input/output tokens, while OpenAI o4-mini costs $1.1/$4.4. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $17.50 versus $17.60.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or OpenAI o4-mini?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 73.3% versus 68.1% for OpenAI o4-mini, making Claude Haiku 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons