Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic · Oct 2025

Anthropic's fast tier: Sonnet-4-class coding performance at $1/$5 and more than twice the speed.

Kimi K2 Thinking

Moonshot AI · Nov 2025

67.6

A trillion-parameter open reasoning agent that can chain 200–300 tool calls — the open-weights agentic standout of late 2025.

The verdict

Kimi K2 Thinking wins 2 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 1 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Kimi K2 Thinking is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Kimi K2 Thinking also takes 262K of context versus 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5. And Kimi K2 Thinking is open-weights (Modified MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 12

SWE-bench Verified
73.3%71.3%
Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 Thinking
GPQA Diamond
~73%84.5%
Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 Thinking
Terminal-Bench
~41%~47.1%
Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 Thinking

Specs & pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 Thinking
modhub Index67.6
Input price / 1M$1$0.6
Output price / 1M$5$2.5
Context window200K262K
Max output64K
Open weightsnoyes (Modified MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2025Apr 2025
ReleasedOct 2025Nov 2025
Example monthly cost*$17.50$9.75

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 Thinking?
Kimi K2 Thinking wins 2 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 1 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Kimi K2 Thinking is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Kimi K2 Thinking also takes 262K of context versus 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5. And Kimi K2 Thinking is open-weights (Modified MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 Thinking?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/$5 per million input/output tokens, while Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.6/$2.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $17.50 versus $9.75.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 Thinking?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 73.3% versus 71.3% for Kimi K2 Thinking, making Claude Haiku 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons