Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3-Max

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Jun 2026

The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

Qwen3-Max

Alibaba (Qwen) · Sep 2025

80.5

Alibaba's trillion-parameter API flagship — frontier-adjacent quality with strong agentic tool use at mid-tier prices.

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Max works out roughly 8.3x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~95%69.6%
Claude Fable 5Qwen3-Max

Specs & pricing

Claude Fable 5Qwen3-Max
modhub Index80.5
Input price / 1M$10$1.2
Output price / 1M$50$6
Context window1M262K
Max output128K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jun 2025
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$175.00$21.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Max works out roughly 8.3x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Max costs $1.2/$6. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $21.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3-Max?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Fable 5 scores ~95% versus 69.6% for Qwen3-Max, making Claude Fable 5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons