Claude Fable 5 vs Amazon Nova Pro
Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.
Anthropic · Jun 2026
The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.
Amazon · Dec 2024
AWS's house multimodal model — chosen for Bedrock-native integration and AWS billing more than for benchmark wins.
The verdict
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Amazon Nova Pro works out roughly 14x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 300K for Amazon Nova Pro.
Specs & pricing
| Claude Fable 5 | Amazon Nova Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| modhub Index | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $10 | $0.8 |
| Output price / 1M | $50 | $3.2 |
| Context window | 1M | 300K |
| Max output | 128K | 10K |
| Open weights | no | no |
| Reasoning model | yes | no |
| Multimodal input | text, image | text, image, video |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2026 | Oct 2024 |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| Example monthly cost* | $175.00 | $12.80 |
* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Amazon Nova Pro?
- These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Amazon Nova Pro works out roughly 14x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 300K for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Amazon Nova Pro?
- Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while Amazon Nova Pro costs $0.8/$3.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $12.80.
- Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Amazon Nova Pro?
- We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.