Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Jun 2026

The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 20x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~95%68%
Claude Fable 5GLM-4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Fable 5GLM-4.6
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$10$0.6
Output price / 1M$50$2.2
Context window1M200K
Max output128K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jul 2025
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$175.00$9.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 20x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $9.30.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Fable 5 scores ~95% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Claude Fable 5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons